While adding content to www.EarthSayers.tv, I am always inspired and educated. EarthSayers are individuals who are taking active steps to motivate and inspire us to change. The 7th Generation Project, for example, is a not for profit social capacity and network project seeking to address the interwoven layer of human, earth and economic sustainability.
In their video at www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6RZVuHIuD4 (yes it is on EarthSayers as well, but until we get funding to build the site out, it is easier and quicker to send you directly to Youtube)
They identify the five key inhibitors to change:
1. Awareness
(I had no idea it was so serious)
2.Capacity
(I don’t know how to fix it)
3. Action
(What can I do about it)
4. Leadership
Why aren’t we doing anything about this?
5. Community
I can’t do this on my own.
EarthSayers.tv is focused on all five inhibitors. Awareness and capacity through the content on EarthSayers.tv and the EarthSayer Leadership Network as proposed is being designed to address inhibitors 3 through 5.
We are going to have to bring more ideas like EarthSayers.tv to the fore that address these inhibitors one by one and with great innovation and activism.
There is much talk in the news about how when the economy tanks, sustainability and its consumer-focused cousin, the Green movement, are moved aside.
A recent article in Sustainable Life Media reported on a study by Cone Marketing and Duke University Fuqua School of Management that found "Consumers are more receptive to cause messages than ever before. More than half (52%) of respondents say companies should maintain their level of financial support of causes and nonprofit organizations, despite current economic woes." Sadly, the article also noted another study by Duke indicating "marketers appear to be taking the opposite tack... chief marketing officers from Fortune 1000 companies predict that more marketers will be shifting away from their cause-related messages over the next year as a result of the souring economy.
One wonders what planet these CMOs are living on if they think they can move away from sustainability practices and products.
A year ago, Andrew Zolli in a March 2007 Face Co. article addressed the conflicting beliefs of "corporations having pressing obligations to civil society and the planet as a whole that go well beyond the economic sphere" and the clinical, value-neutral capitalism championed by Mr. Friedman who warned against "burdening business with wider goals." Mr. Friedman argued it was "pure and unadulterated socialism." Mr. Zolli went on to write:
"The clinical, value-neutral capitalism of old is about to follow the recently departed Friedman to the grave.
There are several reasons why this is so, but the first should be obvious to any one but the most hardened anti-environmental skeptic: If we don't do something soon, we're screwed. A quick (and necessarily depressing) look at the numbers suggests that supplies of our most basic commodities--potable water, fossil fuels, arable land, clean air--as well as critical industrial commodities such as aluminum, steel, and even silicon, are all under stress."
I just don't get where anyone has the idea that the movement towards sustainability is optional.
