
Suggestions for national health insurance: Covering everyone for less
The United States needs to establish individual and family health insurance premiums so that everyone is paying the same percentage of their income per dependent regardless of the source of that income. This percentage would be based on the national cost of health care as a percentage of the gross individual income (not taxable income). In other words, both people on welfare and those earning multi-millions per year would be paying some fair (emotional) share tax deductible premium.
The actual percentage would be slightly higher than the exact equivalent to cover prevention and nutrition education programs, as well as covering administrative costs and the cost of care for those without any income. Also, there would be a surcharge for those who choose to ignore medical advice and/or participate in risky behavior. This surcharge would be based on the rate of how that behavior affects overall cost of health care.
With everyone participating, there would be a reduction in the cost to businesses. There would also be the added benefit of not reducing the effectiveness of our current system of delivery - as everyone would have a vested interest in controlling costs. This would eliminate Medicare and Medicaid and take the cost of health care out of the national tax budget, giving us time to address the other problem with health care.

As an American, I could not possibly disagree more. While I'm ALL for a more manageable, simpler, fair system that works for everyone, the idea of a percentage-based premium is NOT fair in the least. I don't make much money, but I know that those who do should not be punished for it, especially when it comes to something as universal as health. The price of a doctor's visit shouldn't be put on a sliding scale dependent upon how much money you make. Moreover, the idea of having to pay more for turning down medical treatment is an infringement of one of the most intimate human rights in existence - the freedom to do with one's body as one wishes. The ideas put forth in this editorial are well-meaning but extremely short-sighted, and I'm a bit shocked that a publication as intelligent as Ode would allow it.
posted by janwhitetx on 3/16/2009 2:40 pm