Email   Print

Silent spring, again

Speaking up to protect the voices of the wilderness.

Amy Domini | July 2008 issue

Silence can be a source of healing, a refuge from the stress of modern life, a pathway to enlightenment. Or it can have a more sinister meaning. In 1962, Rachel Carson, an accomplished biologist and popular writer, published a book that would change our attitudes toward our planet. Silent Spring began on a deceptively peaceful note, in a chapter called “A Fable for Tomorrow.” “There was once a town in the heart of America,” Carson wrote, “where all life seemed to live in harmony with its surroundings.

The town lay in the midst of a checkerboard of prosperous farms. ... In autumn, oak and maple and birch set up a blaze of colour that flamed and flickered across a backdrop of pines. Then foxes barked in the hills and deer silently crossed the fields, half hidden in the mists of the fall mornings.”

But something went wrong in this idyllic town: “There was a strange stillness. The birds, for example—where had they gone? Many people spoke of them, puzzled and disturbed. The feeding stations in the backyards were deserted. The few birds seen anywhere were moribund; they trembled violently and could not fly. It was a spring without voices. On the mornings that had once throbbed with the dawn choruses of robins, catbirds, doves, jays, wrens and scores of other bird voices there was now no sound; only silence lay over the fields and woods and marsh.”

Millions of Americans responded to this ominous vision, making Silent Spring not only a massive bestseller but one of the most influential books in the country’s history. Silent Spring provided the impetus for a ban on DDT—a popular pesticide that concentrated in the food chain, wreaking havoc on birds and other wildlife—and inspired a powerful environmental movement, with landmarks that include the founding of the Environmental Defense Fund in 1967 and the first Earth Day in 1970.

Social investors have been an important part of this movement. Outrage over the Exxon Valdez oil spill of 1989 led to the creation of the CERES Principles on environmental practises, and shareholders soon filed resolutions calling on major corporations to adhere to them. A combined effort by shareholder activists and indigenous people persuaded government officials in Québec, Canada, to halt a massive hydroelectric project in 1994. And today, investors are encouraging corporations to cut their greenhouse gas emissions, protect fragile habitats and buy lumber and paper grown in sustainably managed forests. Recently, investors including my own firm helped convince JPMorgan Chase—a $1.1 trillion bank with operations in more than 50 countries—to adopt a comprehensive environmental policy.

Yet much work remains to be done. In a chilling reminder that a “silent spring” isn’t an outdated threat, biologist Bridget Stutchbury, author of Silence of the Songbirds, recently wrote in The New York Times that our hunger for out-of-season fruits and vegetables may be killing songbirds in Latin America.

In an effort to meet the demand from North America and Europe for a culinary “endless summer,” farmers in countries like Guatemala, Honduras and Ecuador are spraying their crops “heavily and repeatedly with a chemical cocktail of dangerous pesticides,” as Stutchbury wrote. “Migratory songbirds like bobolinks, barn swallows and Eastern kingbirds are suffering mysterious population declines,” she continued, “and pesticides may well be to blame.”

What can we do as consumers, as citizens and as investors? Stutchbury urges us to buy organic coffee and organic bananas, and avoid Latin American crops such as melons, green beans, tomatoes, bell peppers and strawberries, which are rarely organically grown. We can ask our government representatives to ensure that labels like “organic” are strict and meaningful. Or, as we cut into our out-of-season tomatoes, peppers and melons, we can thank the hundreds of songbirds who were permanently silenced to bring that produce to our table. It’s our choice.

Amy Domini is the founder and CEO of Domini Social Investments, and author of several books on ethical investing.


Tools: Discuss | Email | Print | RSS | Weekly Newsletter
Save/Share:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google
  • Facebook
  • YahooMyWeb
  • StumbleUpon
  • Blue Dot
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
Comments (1)

Keith Akers addresses the moral question of killing insects in A Vegetarian Sourcebook: "What about insects? While there may be reason to kill insects, there is no reason to kill them for food. One distinguishes between the way meat animals are killed for food and the way insects are killed.

"Insects are killed only when they intrude upon human territory, posing a threat to the comfort, health, or well-being of humans. There is a huge difference between ridding oneself of intruders and going out of one's way to find and kill something which would otherwise be harmless."

According to Akers:

"These questions may have a certain fascination for philosophers, but most vegetarians are not bothered by them. For any vegetarian who is not a biological pacifist, there would not seem to be any particular difficulty in distinguishing ethically between insects and plants on the one hand, and animals and humans on the other."

I'd like to see a return to organic farming. In 1989, concern over the use of the pesticide Alar on apples caused many Americans to consider organic produce. We produce pesticides at a rate some 13,000 times faster than we did in the 1950s. Our environment is being flooded by pesticide compounds.

Poisons used to kill insects accumulate on crops, in the soil and in greater concentration in the tissues of living creatures higher on the food chain. The EPA's Pesticide Monitoring Journal reports that "Foods of animal origin (are) the major source of pesticide residues in the diet."

In his Pulitzer Prize nominated book, How to Survive in America the Poisoned, Lewis Regenstein writes: "Meat contains approximately 14 times more pesticides than do plant foods...Thus, by eating foods of animal origin, one ingests greatly concentrated amounts of hazardous chemicals."

A 1976 study by the EPA found the breast milk of mothers who consume animal products to be 50 to 100 times more contaminated by pesticide residues than the milk of vegetarian or vegan mothers.

Organic farming and Integrated Pest Management (IPM) are getting more attention today. These utilize natural insect controls, such as predatory insects, weather, crop rotation, pest-resistant varieties, soil tillage, and other environmentally safe practices.

A 1979 Department of Agriculture task force of scientists and economists came to "...positive conclusions on the importance of organic farming and its potential contributions to agriculture and society." Until the end of the Second World War, American farmers produced bountiful harvests without relying on pesticides. There is no reason why America cannot do so again.

posted by vasumurti on 8/13/2008 12:22 pm

Post a comment

You must be a registered user to comment. If you are already registered Click here to login or Click here for our fast, free registration.